June 21, 2004
The Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript
New analysis of a famously cryptic medieval document suggests that it contains nothing but gibberish
By Gordon Rugg 
In 1912 Wilfrid Voynich, an American rare-book dealer, made the find of a lifetime in the library of a Jesuit college near Rome: a manuscript some 230 pages long, written in an unusual script and richly illustrated with bizarre images of plants, heavenly spheres and bathing women. Voynich immediately recognized the importance of his new acquisition. Although it superficially resembled the handbook of a medieval alchemist or herbalist, the manuscript appeared to be written entirely in code. Features in the illustrations, such as hairstyles, suggested that the book was produced sometime between 1470 and 1500, and a 17th-century letter accompanying the manuscript stated that it had been purchased by Rudolph II, the Holy Roman Emperor, in 1586. During the 1600s, at least two scholars apparently tried to decipher the manuscript, and then it disappeared for nearly 250 years until Voynich unearthed it. 
Voynich asked the leading cryptographers of his day to decode the odd script, which did not match that of any known language. But despite 90 years of effort by some of the world's best code breakers, no one has been able to decipher Voynichese, as the script has become known. The nature and origin of the manuscript remain a mystery. The failure of the code-breaking attempts has raised the suspicion that there may not be any cipher to crack. Voynichese may contain no message at all, and the manuscript may simply be an elaborate hoax. 
Critics of this hypothesis have argued that Voynichese is too complex to be nonsense. How could a medieval hoaxer produce 230 pages of script with so many subtle regularities in the structure and distribution of the words? But I have recently discovered that one can replicate many of the remarkable features of Voynichese using a simple coding tool that was available in the 16th century. The text generated by this technique looks much like Voynichese, but it is merely gibberish, with no hidden message. This finding does not prove that the Voynich manuscript is a hoax, but it does bolster the long-held theory that an English adventurer named Edward Kelley may have concocted the document to defraud Rudolph II. (The emperor reportedly paid a sum of 600 ducats--equivalent to about $50,000 today--for the manuscript.) 
Perhaps more important, I believe that the methods used in this analysis of the Voynich mystery can be applied to difficult questions in other areas. Tackling this hoary puzzle requires expertise in several fields, including cryptography, linguistics and medieval history. As a researcher into expert reasoning--the study of the processes used to solve complex problems--I saw my work on the Voynich manuscript as an informal test of an approach that could be used to identify new ways of tackling long-standing scientific questions. The key step is determining the strengths and weaknesses of the expertise in the relevant fields. 
Baby God's Eye?
The first purported decryption of the Voynich manuscript came in 1921. William R. Newbold, a professor of philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania, claimed that each character in the Voynich script contained tiny pen strokes that could be seen only under magnification and that these strokes formed an ancient Greek shorthand. Based on his reading of the code, Newbold declared that the Voynich manuscript had been written by 13th-century philosopher-scientist Roger Bacon and described discoveries such as the invention of the microscope. Within a decade, however, critics debunked Newbold's solution by showing that the alleged microscopic features of the letters were actually natural cracks in the ink. 
The Voynich manuscript appeared to be either an unusual code, an unknown language or a sophisticated hoax. 
Newbold's attempt was just the start of a string of failures. In the 1940s amateur code breakers Joseph M. Feely and Leonell C. Strong used substitution ciphers that assigned Roman letters to the characters in Voynichese, but the purported translations made little sense. At the end of World War II the U.S. military cryptographers who cracked the Japanese Imperial Navy's codes passed some spare time tackling ciphertexts--encrypted texts--from antiquity. The team deciphered every one except the Voynich manuscript. 
ADVERTISEMENT 
     
 
 
   
     
In 1978 amateur philologist John Stojko claimed that the text was written in Ukrainian with the vowels removed, but his translation--which included sentences such as "Emptiness is that what Baby God's Eye is fighting for"--did not jibe with the manuscript's illustrations nor with Ukrainian history. In 1987 a physician named Leo Levitov asserted that the document had been produced by the Cathars, a heretical sect that flourished in medieval France, and was written in a pidgin composed of words from various languages. Levitov's translation, though, was at odds with the Cathars' well-documented theology.        
Furthermore, all these schemes used mechanisms that allowed the same Voynichese word to be translated one way in one part of the manuscript and a different way in another part. For example, one step in Newbold's solution involved the deciphering of anagrams, which is notoriously imprecise: the anagram ADER, for instance, can be interpreted as READ, DARE or DEAR. Most scholars agree that all the attempted decodings of the Voynich manuscript are tainted by an unacceptable degree of ambiguity. Moreover, none of these methods could encode plaintext--that is, a readable message--into a ciphertext with the striking properties of Voynichese.          
If the manuscript is not a code, could it be an unidentified language? Even though we cannot decipher the text, we know that it shows an extraordinary amount of regularity. For instance, the most common words often occur two or more times in a row. To represent the words, I will use the European Voynich Alphabet (EVA), a convention for transliterating the characters of Voynichese into Roman letters. An example from folio 78R of the manuscript reads: qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy. This degree of repetition is not found in any known language. Conversely, Voynichese contains very few phrases where two or three different words regularly occur together. These characteristics make it unlikely that Voynichese is a human language--it is simply too different from all other languages.            
The third possibility is that the manuscript was a hoax devised for monetary gain or that it is some mad alchemist's meaningless ramblings. The linguistic complexity of the manuscript seems to argue against this theory. In addition to the repetition of words, there are numerous regularities in the internal structure of the words. The common syllable qo, for instance, occurs only at the start of words. The syllable chek may appear at the start of a word, but if it occurs in the same word as qo, then qo always comes before chek. The common syllable dy usually appears at the end of a word and occasionally at the start but never in the middle.              
A simple "pick and mix" hoax that combines the syllables at random could not produce a text with so many regularities. Voynichese is also much more complex than anything found in pathological speech caused by brain damage or psychological disorders. Even if a mad alchemist did construct a grammar for an invented language and then spent years writing a script that employed this grammar, the resulting text would not share the various statistical features of the Voynich manuscript. For example, the word lengths of Voynichese form a binomial distribution--that is, the most common words have five or six characters, and the occurrence of words with greater or fewer characters falls off steeply from that peak in a symmetric bell curve. This kind of distribution is extremely unusual in a human language. In almost all human languages, the distribution of word lengths is broader and asymmetric, with a higher occurrence of relatively long words. It is very unlikely that the binomial distribution of Voynichese could have been a deliberate part of a hoax, because this statistical concept was not invented until centuries after the manuscript was written.                
Expert Reasoning                  
In summary, the Voynich manuscript appeared to be either an extremely unusual code, a strange unknown language or a sophisticated hoax, and there was no obvious way to resolve the impasse. It so happened that my colleague Joanne Hyde and I were looking for just such a puzzle a few years ago. We had been developing a method for critically reevaluating the expertise and reasoning used in the investigation of difficult research problems. As a preliminary test, I applied this method to the research on the Voynich manuscript. I started by determining the types of expertise that had previously been applied to the problem.                  
                   
The assessment that the features of Voynichese are inconsistent with any human language was based on substantial relevant expertise from linguistics. This conclusion appeared sound, so I proceeded to the hoax hypothesis. Most people who have studied the Voynich manuscript agreed that Voynichese was too complex to be a hoax. I found, however, that this assessment was based on opinion rather than firm evidence. There is no body of expertise on how to mimic a long medieval ciphertext, because there are hardly any examples of such texts, let alone hoaxes of this genre.                      
Several researchers, such as Jorge Stolfi of the University of Campinas in Brazil, had wondered whether the Voynich manuscript was produced using random text-generation tables. These tables have cells that contain characters or syllables; the user selects a sequence of cells--perhaps by throwing dice--and combines them to form a word. This technique could generate some of the regularities within Voynichese words. Under Stolfi's method, the table's first column could contain prefix syllables, such as qo, that occur only at the start of words; the second column could contain midfixes (syllables appearing in the middle of words) such as chek, and the third column could contain suffix syllables such as y. Choosing a syllable from each column in sequence would produce words with the characteristic structure of Voynichese. Some of the cells might be empty, so that one could create words lacking a prefix, midfix or suffix.                        
                         
English adventurer Edward Kelley may have concocted the document to defraud Rudolph II, the Holy Roman Emperor.                          
                         
Other features of Voynichese, however, are not so easily reproduced. For instance, some characters are individually common but rarely occur next to each other. The characters transcribed as a, e and l are common, as is the combination al, but the combination el is very rare. This effect cannot be produced by randomly mixing characters from a table, so Stolfi and others rejected this approach. The key term here, though, is "randomly." To modern researchers, randomness is an invaluable concept. Yet it is a concept developed long after the manuscript was created. A medieval hoaxer probably would have used a different way of combining syllables that might not have been random in the strict statistical sense. I began to wonder whether some of the features of Voynichese might be side effects of a long-obsolete device.                            
The Cardan Grille                              
It looked as if the hoax hypothesis deserved further investigation. My next step was to attempt to produce a hoax document to see what side effects emerged. The first question was, Which techniques to use? The answer depended on the date when the manuscript was produced. Having worked in archaeology, a field in which dating artifacts is an important concern, I was wary of the general consensus among Voynich researchers that the manuscript was created before 1500. It was illustrated in the style of the late 1400s, but this attribute did not conclusively pin down the date of its origin; artistic works are often produced in the style of an earlier period, either innocently or to make the document look older. I therefore searched for a coding technique that was available during the widest possible range of origin dates--between 1470 and 1608.                              
A promising possibility was the Cardan grille, which was introduced by Italian mathematician Girolamo Cardano in 1550. It consists of a card with slots cut in it. When the grille is laid over an apparently innocuous text produced with another copy of the same card, the slots reveal the words of the hidden message. I realized that a Cardan grille with three slots could be used to select permutations of prefixes, midfixes and suffixes from a table to generate Voynichese-style words.                                
A typical page of the Voynich manuscript contains about 10 to 40 lines, each consisting of about eight to 12 words. Using the three-syllable model of Voynichese, a single table of 36 columns and 40 rows would contain enough syllables to produce an entire manuscript page with a single grille. The first column would list prefixes, the second midfixes and the third suffixes; the following columns would repeat that pattern. You can align the grille to the upper left corner of the table to create the first word of Voynichese and then move it three columns to the right to make the next word. Or you can move the grille to a column farther to the right or to a lower row. By successively positioning the grille over different parts of the table, you can create hundreds of Voynichese words. And the same table could then be used with a different grille to make the words of the next page.                                  
                                   
I drew up three tables by hand, which took two or three hours per table. Each grille took two or three minutes to cut out. (I made about 10.) After that, I could generate text as fast as I could transcribe it. In all, I produced between 1,000 and 2,000 words this way.                                      
I found that this method could easily reproduce most of the features of Voynichese. For example, you can ensure that some characters never occur together by carefully designing the tables and grilles. If successive grille slots are always on different rows, then the syllables in horizontally adjacent cells in the table will never occur together, even though they may be very common individually. The binomial distribution of word lengths can be generated by mixing short, medium-length and long syllables in the table. Another characteristic of Voynichese--that the first words in a line tend to be longer than later ones--can be reproduced simply by putting most of the longer syllables on the left side of the table.                                        
The Cardan grille method therefore appears to be a mechanism by which the Voynich manuscript could have been created. My reconstructions suggest that one person could have produced the manuscript, including the illustrations, in just three or four months. But a crucial question remains: Does the manuscript contain only meaningless gibberish or a coded message?                                          
I found two ways to employ the grilles and tables to encode and decode plaintext. The first was a substitution cipher that converted plaintext characters to midfix syllables that are then embedded within meaningless prefixes and suffixes using the method described above. The second encoding technique assigned a number to each plaintext character and then used these numbers to specify the placement of the Cardan grille on the table. Both techniques, however, produce scripts with much less repetition of words than Voynichese. This finding indicates that if the Cardan grille was indeed used to make the Voynich manuscript, the author was probably creating cleverly designed nonsense rather than a ciphertext. I found no evidence that the manuscript contains a coded message.                                            
This absence of evidence does not prove that the manuscript was a hoax, but my work shows that the construction of a hoax as complex as the Voynich manuscript was indeed feasible. This explanation dovetails with several intriguing historical facts: Elizabethan scholar John Dee and his disreputable associate Edward Kelley visited the court of Rudolf II during the 1580s. Kelley was a notorious forger, mystic and alchemist who was familiar with Cardan grilles. Some experts on the Voynich manuscript have long suspected that Kelley was the author.                                              
My undergraduate student Laura Aylward is currently investigating whether more complex statistical features of the manuscript can be reproduced using the Cardan grille technique. Answering this question will require producing large amounts of text using different table and grille layouts, so we are writing software to automate the method.                                                
This study yielded valuable insights into the process of reexamining difficult problems to determine whether any possible solutions have been overlooked. A good example of such a problem is the question of what causes Alzheimer's disease. We plan to examine whether our approach could be used to reevaluate previous research into this brain disorder. Our questions will include: Have the investigators neglected any field of relevant expertise? Have the key assumptions been tested sufficiently? And are there subtle misunderstandings between the different disciplines that are involved in this work? If we can use this process to help Alzheimer's researchers find promising new directions, then a medieval manuscript that looks like an alchemist's handbook may actually prove to be a boon to modern medicine.                                                  
                                                 
                                                 
GORDON RUGG became interested in the Voynich manuscript about four years ago. At first he viewed it as merely an intriguing puzzle, but later he saw it as a test case for reexamining complex problems. He earned his Ph.D. in psychology at the University of Reading in 1987. Now a senior lecturer in the School of Computing and Mathematics at Keele University in England, Rugg is editor in chief of Expert Systems: The International Journal of Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks. His research interests include the nature of expertise and the modeling of information, knowledge and beliefs.                                              
                                           
                                         
                                       

<http://www.sciam.com/print_version.cfm?articleID=0000E3AA-70E1-10CF-AD1983414B7F0000>    Scientific American:       June 21, 2004    The Mystery of the Voynich Manuscript    New analysis of a famously cryptic medieval document suggests that it  contains nothing but gibberish    By Gordon Rugg       In 1912 Wilfrid Voynich, an American rare-book dealer, made the find of a  lifetime in the library of a Jesuit college near Rome: a manuscript some  230 pages long, written in an unusual script and richly illustrated with  bizarre images of plants, heavenly spheres and bathing women. Voynich  immediately recognized the importance of his new acquisition. Although it  superficially resembled the handbook of a medieval alchemist or herbalist,  the manuscript appeared to be written entirely in code. Features in the  illustrations, such as hairstyles, suggested that the book was produced  sometime between 1470 and 1500, and a 17th-century letter accompanying the  manuscript stated that it had been purchased by Rudolph II, the Holy Roman  Emperor, in 1586. During the 1600s, at least two scholars apparently tried  to decipher the manuscript, and then it disappeared for nearly 250 years  until Voynich unearthed it.     Voynich asked the leading cryptographers of his day to decode the odd  script, which did not match that of any known language. But despite 90  years of effort by some of the world's best code breakers, no one has been  able to decipher Voynichese, as the script has become known. The nature and  origin of the manuscript remain a mystery. The failure of the code-breaking  attempts has raised the suspicion that there may not be any cipher to  crack. Voynichese may contain no message at all, and the manuscript may  simply be an elaborate hoax.     Critics of this hypothesis have argued that Voynichese is too complex to  be nonsense. How could a medieval hoaxer produce 230 pages of script with  so many subtle regularities in the structure and distribution of the words?  But I have recently discovered that one can replicate many of the  remarkable features of Voynichese using a simple coding tool that was  available in the 16th century. The text generated by this technique looks  much like Voynichese, but it is merely gibberish, with no hidden message.  This finding does not prove that the Voynich manuscript is a hoax, but it  does bolster the long-held theory that an English adventurer named Edward  Kelley may have concocted the document to defraud Rudolph II. (The emperor  reportedly paid a sum of 600 ducats--equivalent to about $50,000 today--for  the manuscript.)     Perhaps more important, I believe that the methods used in this analysis  of the Voynich mystery can be applied to difficult questions in other  areas. Tackling this hoary puzzle requires expertise in several fields,  including cryptography, linguistics and medieval history. As a researcher  into expert reasoning--the study of the processes used to solve complex  problems--I saw my work on the Voynich manuscript as an informal test of an  approach that could be used to identify new ways of tackling long-standing  scientific questions. The key step is determining the strengths and  weaknesses of the expertise in the relevant fields.     Baby God's Eye?   The first purported decryption of the Voynich manuscript came in 1921.  William R. Newbold, a professor of philosophy at the University of  Pennsylvania, claimed that each character in the Voynich script contained  tiny pen strokes that could be seen only under magnification and that these  strokes formed an ancient Greek shorthand. Based on his reading of the  code, Newbold declared that the Voynich manuscript had been written by  13th-century philosopher-scientist Roger Bacon and described discoveries  such as the invention of the microscope. Within a decade, however, critics  debunked Newbold's solution by showing that the alleged microscopic  features of the letters were actually natural cracks in the ink.     The Voynich manuscript appeared to be either an unusual code, an unknown  language or a sophisticated hoax.    Newbold's attempt was just the start of a string of failures. In the 1940s  amateur code breakers Joseph M. Feely and Leonell C. Strong used  substitution ciphers that assigned Roman letters to the characters in  Voynichese, but the purported translations made little sense. At the end of  World War II the U.S. military cryptographers who cracked the Japanese  Imperial Navy's codes passed some spare time tackling  ciphertexts--encrypted texts--from antiquity. The team deciphered every one  except the Voynich manuscript.     In 1978 amateur philologist John Stojko claimed that the text was written  in Ukrainian with the vowels removed, but his translation--which included  sentences such as "Emptiness is that what Baby God's Eye is fighting  for"--did not jibe with the manuscript's illustrations nor with Ukrainian  history. In 1987 a physician named Leo Levitov asserted that the document  had been produced by the Cathars, a heretical sect that flourished in  medieval France, and was written in a pidgin composed of words from various  languages. Levitov's translation, though, was at odds with the Cathars'  well-documented theology.     Furthermore, all these schemes used mechanisms that allowed the same  Voynichese word to be translated one way in one part of the manuscript and  a different way in another part. For example, one step in Newbold's  solution involved the deciphering of anagrams, which is notoriously  imprecise: the anagram ADER, for instance, can be interpreted as READ, DARE  or DEAR. Most scholars agree that all the attempted decodings of the  Voynich manuscript are tainted by an unacceptable degree of ambiguity.  Moreover, none of these methods could encode plaintext--that is, a readable  message--into a ciphertext with the striking properties of Voynichese.     If the manuscript is not a code, could it be an unidentified language?  Even though we cannot decipher the text, we know that it shows an  extraordinary amount of regularity. For instance, the most common words  often occur two or more times in a row. To represent the words, I will use  the European Voynich Alphabet (EVA), a convention for transliterating the  characters of Voynichese into Roman letters. An example from folio 78R of  the manuscript reads: qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy. This degree of  repetition is not found in any known language. Conversely, Voynichese  contains very few phrases where two or three different words regularly  occur together. These characteristics make it unlikely that Voynichese is a  human language--it is simply too different from all other languages.     The third possibility is that the manuscript was a hoax devised for  monetary gain or that it is some mad alchemist's meaningless ramblings. The  linguistic complexity of the manuscript seems to argue against this theory.  In addition to the repetition of words, there are numerous regularities in  the internal structure of the words. The common syllable qo, for instance,  occurs only at the start of words. The syllable chek may appear at the  start of a word, but if it occurs in the same word as qo, then qo always  comes before chek. The common syllable dy usually appears at the end of a  word and occasionally at the start but never in the middle.     A simple "pick and mix" hoax that combines the syllables at random could  not produce a text with so many regularities. Voynichese is also much more  complex than anything found in pathological speech caused by brain damage  or psychological disorders. Even if a mad alchemist did construct a grammar  for an invented language and then spent years writing a script that  employed this grammar, the resulting text would not share the various  statistical features of the Voynich manuscript. For example, the word  lengths of Voynichese form a binomial distribution--that is, the most  common words have five or six characters, and the occurrence of words with  greater or fewer characters falls off steeply from that peak in a symmetric  bell curve. This kind of distribution is extremely unusual in a human  language. In almost all human languages, the distribution of word lengths  is broader and asymmetric, with a higher occurrence of relatively long  words. It is very unlikely that the binomial distribution of Voynichese  could have been a deliberate part of a hoax, because this statistical  concept was not invented until centuries after the manuscript was written.     Expert Reasoning   In summary, the Voynich manuscript appeared to be either an extremely  unusual code, a strange unknown language or a sophisticated hoax, and there  was no obvious way to resolve the impasse. It so happened that my colleague  Joanne Hyde and I were looking for just such a puzzle a few years ago. We  had been developing a method for critically reevaluating the expertise and  reasoning used in the investigation of difficult research problems. As a  preliminary test, I applied this method to the research on the Voynich  manuscript. I started by determining the types of expertise that had  previously been applied to the problem.     The assessment that the features of Voynichese are inconsistent with any  human language was based on substantial relevant expertise from  linguistics. This conclusion appeared sound, so I proceeded to the hoax  hypothesis. Most people who have studied the Voynich manuscript agreed that  Voynichese was too complex to be a hoax. I found, however, that this  assessment was based on opinion rather than firm evidence. There is no body  of expertise on how to mimic a long medieval ciphertext, because there are  hardly any examples of such texts, let alone hoaxes of this genre.     Several researchers, such as Jorge Stolfi of the University of Campinas in  Brazil, had wondered whether the Voynich manuscript was produced using  random text-generation tables. These tables have cells that contain  characters or syllables; the user selects a sequence of cells--perhaps by  throwing dice--and combines them to form a word. This technique could  generate some of the regularities within Voynichese words. Under Stolfi's  method, the table's first column could contain prefix syllables, such as  qo, that occur only at the start of words; the second column could contain  midfixes (syllables appearing in the middle of words) such as chek, and the  third column could contain suffix syllables such as y. Choosing a syllable  from each column in sequence would produce words with the characteristic  structure of Voynichese. Some of the cells might be empty, so that one  could create words lacking a prefix, midfix or suffix.     English adventurer Edward Kelley may have concocted the document to  defraud Rudolph II, the Holy Roman Emperor.     Other features of Voynichese, however, are not so easily reproduced. For  instance, some characters are individually common but rarely occur next to  each other. The characters transcribed as a, e and l are common, as is the  combination al, but the combination el is very rare. This effect cannot be  produced by randomly mixing characters from a table, so Stolfi and others  rejected this approach. The key term here, though, is "randomly." To modern  researchers, randomness is an invaluable concept. Yet it is a concept  developed long after the manuscript was created. A medieval hoaxer probably  would have used a different way of combining syllables that might not have  been random in the strict statistical sense. I began to wonder whether some  of the features of Voynichese might be side effects of a long-obsolete  device.     The Cardan Grille   It looked as if the hoax hypothesis deserved further investigation. My  next step was to attempt to produce a hoax document to see what side  effects emerged. The first question was, Which techniques to use? The  answer depended on the date when the manuscript was produced. Having worked  in archaeology, a field in which dating artifacts is an important concern,  I was wary of the general consensus among Voynich researchers that the  manuscript was created before 1500. It was illustrated in the style of the  late 1400s, but this attribute did not conclusively pin down the date of  its origin; artistic works are often produced in the style of an earlier  period, either innocently or to make the document look older. I therefore  searched for a coding technique that was available during the widest  possible range of origin dates--between 1470 and 1608.     A promising possibility was the Cardan grille, which was introduced by  Italian mathematician Girolamo Cardano in 1550. It consists of a card with  slots cut in it. When the grille is laid over an apparently innocuous text  produced with another copy of the same card, the slots reveal the words of  the hidden message. I realized that a Cardan grille with three slots could  be used to select permutations of prefixes, midfixes and suffixes from a  table to generate Voynichese-style words.     A typical page of the Voynich manuscript contains about 10 to 40 lines,  each consisting of about eight to 12 words. Using the three-syllable model  of Voynichese, a single table of 36 columns and 40 rows would contain  enough syllables to produce an entire manuscript page with a single grille.  The first column would list prefixes, the second midfixes and the third  suffixes; the following columns would repeat that pattern. You can align  the grille to the upper left corner of the table to create the first word  of Voynichese and then move it three columns to the right to make the next  word. Or you can move the grille to a column farther to the right or to a  lower row. By successively positioning the grille over different parts of  the table, you can create hundreds of Voynichese words. And the same table  could then be used with a different grille to make the words of the next  page.     I drew up three tables by hand, which took two or three hours per table.  Each grille took two or three minutes to cut out. (I made about 10.) After  that, I could generate text as fast as I could transcribe it. In all, I  produced between 1,000 and 2,000 words this way.     I found that this method could easily reproduce most of the features of  Voynichese. For example, you can ensure that some characters never occur  together by carefully designing the tables and grilles. If successive  grille slots are always on different rows, then the syllables in  horizontally adjacent cells in the table will never occur together, even  though they may be very common individually. The binomial distribution of  word lengths can be generated by mixing short, medium-length and long  syllables in the table. Another characteristic of Voynichese--that the  first words in a line tend to be longer than later ones--can be reproduced  simply by putting most of the longer syllables on the left side of the  table.     The Cardan grille method therefore appears to be a mechanism by which the  Voynich manuscript could have been created. My reconstructions suggest that  one person could have produced the manuscript, including the illustrations,  in just three or four months. But a crucial question remains: Does the  manuscript contain only meaningless gibberish or a coded message?     I found two ways to employ the grilles and tables to encode and decode  plaintext. The first was a substitution cipher that converted plaintext  characters to midfix syllables that are then embedded within meaningless  prefixes and suffixes using the method described above. The second encoding  technique assigned a number to each plaintext character and then used these  numbers to specify the placement of the Cardan grille on the table. Both  techniques, however, produce scripts with much less repetition of words  than Voynichese. This finding indicates that if the Cardan grille was  indeed used to make the Voynich manuscript, the author was probably  creating cleverly designed nonsense rather than a ciphertext. I found no  evidence that the manuscript contains a coded message.     This absence of evidence does not prove that the manuscript was a hoax,  but my work shows that the construction of a hoax as complex as the Voynich  manuscript was indeed feasible. This explanation dovetails with several  intriguing historical facts: Elizabethan scholar John Dee and his  disreputable associate Edward Kelley visited the court of Rudolf II during  the 1580s. Kelley was a notorious forger, mystic and alchemist who was  familiar with Cardan grilles. Some experts on the Voynich manuscript have  long suspected that Kelley was the author.     My undergraduate student Laura Aylward is currently investigating whether  more complex statistical features of the manuscript can be reproduced using  the Cardan grille technique. Answering this question will require producing  large amounts of text using different table and grille layouts, so we are  writing software to automate the method.     This study yielded valuable insights into the process of reexamining  difficult problems to determine whether any possible solutions have been  overlooked. A good example of such a problem is the question of what causes  Alzheimer's disease. We plan to examine whether our approach could be used  to reevaluate previous research into this brain disorder. Our questions  will include: Have the investigators neglected any field of relevant  expertise? Have the key assumptions been tested sufficiently? And are there  subtle misunderstandings between the different disciplines that are  involved in this work? If we can use this process to help Alzheimer's  researchers find promising new directions, then a medieval manuscript that  looks like an alchemist's handbook may actually prove to be a boon to  modern medicine.      GORDON RUGG became interested in the Voynich manuscript about four years  ago. At first he viewed it as merely an intriguing puzzle, but later he saw  it as a test case for reexamining complex problems. He earned his Ph.D. in  psychology at the University of Reading in 1987. Now a senior lecturer in  the School of Computing and Mathematics at Keele University in England,  Rugg is editor in chief of Expert Systems: The International Journal of  Knowledge Engineering and Neural Networks. His research interests include  the nature of expertise and the modeling of information, knowledge and  beliefs.    © 1996-2004 Scientific American, Inc. All rights reserved.   Reproduction in whole or in part without permission is prohibited.  --   -----------------  R. A. Hettinga <mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>  The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/>  44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA  "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity,  [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to  experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'    ---------------------------------------------------------------------  The Cryptography Mailing List  Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]    

• Prev by Date: Re: cryptograph(y|er) jokes?
• Next by Date: Swiss NEMA rotor machine for sale on EBay
• Previous by thread: [Publicity-list]: DIMACS Workshop on Usable Privacy and Security Software
• Next by thread: Swiss NEMA rotor machine for sale on EBay
• Index(es):
  • Main
  • Thread

EVE 6 | Promise Lyrics

Sleeping through the evening singing dreams inside my head I'm heading out I've got some ins Who say they care and they just might I run away with you if things don't go as planned Planning big could be a gamble I've already rolled the dice I spit, stutter stuff and clutter worries in my worried corner Maladjusted, just, untrusted, rusted, Sometimes brilliant busted thoughts Think I'll stay for a while I'm intrigued And I'm red as a newborn white as a corpse I promise not to try not to fuck with your mind I promise not to mind if you go your way and I go mine I promise not to lie if I'm looking you straight in the eye I promise not to try not to let you down I am elated I am all smiles and dated In my man bites dog town with a Spanish name I am all bone I am two toned red as a newborn white as a corpse I promise not to try not to fuck with your mind I promise not to mind if you go your way and I go mine I promise not to lie if I'm looking you straight in the eye I promise not to try not to let you down Why you gotta keep the fan on high when it's cold outside Just want to let you know that I'm still a fan, get it? Everybody wants charm and a smile and a promise I promise not to try I promise not to try not to fuck with your mind I promise not to mind if you go your way and I go mine I promise not to lie if I'm looking you straight in the eye I promise not to try not to not to not to leave (Promise not to try) Not to leave (Promise not to try) Not to not to leave (Promise not to try) I won't leave I won't leave